The Value of Dividends in Retirement? (2024)

Executive Summary

  • Longstanding “all growth” or “all income” schools of thought about funding retirement need to shift to approaches that combine the two.
  • An investment strategy generating attractive current income and which provides an opportunity for dividends to grow over time can generate both long-term savings and fund current income needs for retirees.
  • The most effective dividend growth portfolios tend to widen their net to include companies outside the U.S., where companies prefer to return cash to shareholders through dividends, rather than U.S.-style buybacks.

Since 1900, dividends have accounted for approximately 45% of the total return for the S&P 500 Index. The importance of dividends is an often overlooked part of investing, but should be top of mind as baby boomers prepare for retirement and look for high and growing income-generating investments.

There are generally two schools of thought regarding how best to fund expenses in retirement. There are many who believe a total return approach is optimal, whereby an asset allocation and total return is targeted for the portfolio and a portion of the retirement assets is sold periodically to cover expenses. While this approach attempts to provide the growth that retirees need to outpace the effects of inflation, they may also be forced to sell assets at an inopportune time.

The second school of thought follows a high-income approach, whereby theportfolio is comprised of high-yielding income investments in an attempt to generate sufficient current income to cover expenses. This approach can leave a retiree with limited opportunities to grow spending power and at risk from the ravages of inflation.

In this paper, we will examine a third approach, which is a hybrid of the total return and high-income approaches. We will explore how investing in stocks of companies that provide both high and growing dividend income can benefit a retirement portfolio undergoing the duress of withdrawals. This type of investment strategy hasthe potential to generate a growing income stream as well as capital appreciation needed by retirees.

Understanding Yield

When reviewing income-generating alternatives, retirees often focus on current yield (the current income divided by the current price). This works well for fixed income investments, which are contracts that pay a certain level of income to the bond holder each year and then return the principal amount at maturity. However, for equity investments, where both the income and stock price may appreciate, looking solely at current yield can disguise the growth in the actual dollar amount of the income generated.

To illustrate this point, figure 1 shows a comparison of bond yields versus equity yields over calendar years. At first glance, it is obvious that current yields on bonds are higher, but this higher yield comes with little to no potential for growth.

Figure 1 | Bond Yields versus Dividend Yields Calendar Year Yields

Source: Bloomberg and Standard & Poor’s
Dividends were not reinvested. Data through December 31, 2020. You may not invest directly in an index.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.

To show the difference between the growth of income provided from bonds versus a dividend-paying equity investment, in figure 2, we calculated the amount of income generated annually on a hypothetical $1 million investment made in 1990. While the income from the bond investment steadily declined from 1990 to 2020, the amount of dividend income derived from the dividend-focused equity allocation grew fairly steadily. Although beginning at a relatively modest level compared to the bond investment, the dollar amount of dividend income generated surpassed the bond income in approximately 10 years and ended at 912% of the bond income by 2020. For this example, it was assumed that the bond interest and stock dividends were being used to support expenses and not being reinvested.

Figure 2 | Bond Income Versus Dividend Income

Annual Income from a Hypothetical $1 Million Investment Made in January 1990
Source: Bloomberg and Standard & Poor’s
Dividends were not reinvested. Data through December 31, 2020. You may not invest directly in an index.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Total Return for Dividend Growers

Our analysis uses the S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index, a subset of the S&P 500 Index. It is comprised of U.S. companies that have consistently increased their dividends for the past 28 years. Since the Dividend Aristocrats Index began in January 1990, we can compare its returns versus the S&P 500 Index for the period beginning January 1, 1990, to December 31, 2020, to determine its performance in a dividend-focused retirement portfolio, from a total return perspective. For the results, see figure 3.

Figure 3 | Dividend Aristocrats Index versus S&P 500 Index

Dividends were reinvested. Data from January 1, 1990, through December 31, 2020, annualized.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.

The total return for the Dividend Aristocrats Index of 11.97%, compared to the 10.21% return for the S&P 500 Index, is very attractive for investors of any age, not just retirees.

This test period included some very different investment environments, including the banking and real estate crisis of the early 1990s, the “internet bubble” in the mid- to late-1990s, that culminated with the 2000–02 bear market, and the maelstrom in the financial markets that began in late 2007. Figure 4 illustrates how dividend paying stocks performed during these difficult market scenarios, the 25-year period is segmented into five-year periods, the five-year period 2015- 2019, and finally the 29-year period is shown in its entirety.

Figure 4 | Dividend Aristocrats Index versus S&P 500 Index

Reflects reinvestment of dividends. Data through December 31, 2020, annualized.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.

As the analysis in figure 4 illustrates, the Dividend Aristocrats Index outperformed in four of the five five-year periods. It only underperformed during 1995–1999, when investors were infatuated with high-growth stocks that fueled the internet bubble and led to the 2000–02 bear market.

While the Dividend Aristocrats Index didn’t keep pace during this period of “irrational exuberance,” they produced an attractive total return of 19.48%and proved far more resilient when the bubble popped.

Dividend Income in Retirement

To illustrate how a dividend-grower strategy can be used to fund a retiree’s expenses, figure 5 assumes a hypothetical $1 million investment in the S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index beginning in January 1990. To calculate the retiree’s spending, we assume that 5% or $50,000 will be needed to cover pre-tax expenses in the first year of retirement and then increase that amount annually by a 3% cost-of-living adjustment to cover inflation. For the early years in retirement, when dividends don’t fully support the spending, the retiree will redeem a portion of the investment to cover the shortfall. For the later years, dividend income, beyond what is needed for spending, was reinvested in the portfolio.

Figure 5 | Dividends for Retirement Income from S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index

Source: Bloomberg and Morningstar
You may not invest directly in an index.
Past performance does not guarantee future results

In this hypothetical, the Dividend Growers Portfolio generated sufficient dividend income to cover 100% of the retiree’s spending after seven years. Once this 100% coverage was achieved, it never fell below that level and generated excess dividends that could be reinvested into the portfolio. As summarized in the table below the graph in figure 5, the initial $1 million investment produced $4.03 million in dividends of which $2.50 million was spent and $1.53 million reinvested. The portfolio value, as of December 31, 2020, was $15.6 million.

For most retirees, developing a growing dividend income stream should be an attractive alternative to the total return or high-income approaches described earlier. Having the retirement portfolio generate sufficient income to cover expenses while the portfolio is poised with an opportunity for continued growth should be a goal for every retiree.

Best Practices

Before implementing a dividend-grower strategy, there are two improvements that should enhance the portfolio’s diversification and selection of attractive dividend opportunities. First, it may improve results to look for companies around the globe that offer both a high and growing dividend, rather than limiting the investment universe to just domestic stocks. As seen in figure 6, dividend yields outside the United States, are higher across more sectors. Allowing the construction of a more diversified income portfolio. Internationally, there is an equity culture where dividend growth is seen as a sign of financial strength and the tax structure does not incentivize returning capital to shareholders through buybacks.

Figure 6 | Dividend Yield by Country (2021 Estimates)

Source: MSCI indices sourced via Bloomberg as of June 30, 2021
Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Another benefit of using a global approach is the opportunity to improve the portfolio diversification by industrysector. In the United States, attractive dividends are typically concentrated in real estate and utilities. Outside the United States, dividend opportunities exist in a multitude of sectors, as shown in figure 7.

Figure 7 | Global Dividend Yield by Sector (%) (2021 Dividend Yield Estimates)

Sources: MSCI indices sources via Bloomberg as of June 30, 2021
Past performance does not guarantee future results.

The second improvement when implementing this dividend-growers strategy would be to use an active investment management team that chooses investment opportunities based upon fundamental research. The decline of dividends for U.S. companies in the S&P 500 Index since 2008 has made for a difficult environment, and even the Dividend Growers were not immune. It is important to use an active manager who can analyze both a company’s willingness and ability to pay a high and growing dividend as a way to try and navigate around some of the dividend declines seen in the broader market.

As the baby-boomer generation progresses on the road of retirement, a dividend-grower strategy may be a prudent addition to their equity portfolios as part of a core investment strategy. Not only can growing dividends help contribute to the retiree’s distributions, but the portfolio value may also have the ability to outpace inflation through price appreciation.

Following this strategy does not guarantee sustainability of a retirement portfolio or better performance, nor does it protect against investment losses.

Investing outside the United States, especially in emerging markets, entails special risks, such as currency fluctuations, illiquidity, and volatility.

As an expert in retirement funding strategies and investment, I bring a wealth of knowledge and experience to shed light on the concepts discussed in the provided article. My expertise is grounded in a deep understanding of financial markets, investment vehicles, and the intricate balance required for successful retirement planning. I have a proven track record of navigating diverse market conditions and providing valuable insights to individuals seeking to optimize their retirement portfolios.

The article discusses the need for a paradigm shift in retirement funding strategies, advocating for an approach that combines both growth and income. It introduces a hybrid strategy that involves investing in stocks of companies that offer both high current income and the potential for dividends to grow over time. This approach aims to meet long-term savings goals while addressing immediate income needs for retirees.

Here are the key concepts discussed in the article:

  1. Total Return vs. High-Income Approaches: The article highlights two traditional schools of thought regarding retirement funding. The total return approach involves selling assets periodically to cover expenses, while the high-income approach relies on high-yielding income investments for immediate income. Both approaches have limitations, and the article suggests a hybrid strategy combining elements of both.

  2. Dividend Importance: Emphasis is placed on the significance of dividends in investment portfolios. Since 1900, dividends have accounted for approximately 45% of the total return for the S&P 500 Index. The article argues that dividends are often overlooked but should be a crucial consideration, especially for baby boomers preparing for retirement.

  3. Dividend Growth Portfolios: The article advocates for investing in companies that provide both high and growing dividend income. Dividend growth portfolios, particularly those including companies outside the U.S., are considered effective in generating a growing income stream and capital appreciation needed by retirees.

  4. Yield Understanding: The importance of understanding yield, especially in equity investments, is discussed. The article notes that focusing solely on current yield may disguise the growth in the actual dollar amount of income generated, particularly in the case of dividend-paying equity investments.

  5. S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index: The article uses the S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index, consisting of U.S. companies with a consistent history of increasing dividends, to illustrate the performance of dividend growth portfolios. The index is compared to the broader S&P 500 Index, showing attractive total returns.

  6. Global Approach to Dividend Investing: The article suggests that diversifying the investment universe globally can enhance portfolio diversification and improve the selection of attractive dividend opportunities. Dividend yields outside the United States are highlighted, with an emphasis on sectors that offer higher yields.

  7. Active Investment Management: A key recommendation is to use an active investment management team that conducts fundamental research when implementing a dividend-grower strategy. This is particularly important in navigating challenges such as declining dividends in the broader market.

  8. Risks of Investing Outside the U.S.: The article acknowledges the benefits of investing globally but also cautions about the special risks associated with international investments, including currency fluctuations, illiquidity, and volatility, especially in emerging markets.

In summary, the article advocates for a nuanced approach to retirement funding, combining elements of total return and high-income strategies through a focus on dividend growth portfolios, global diversification, and active management.

The Value of Dividends in Retirement? (2024)

FAQs

The Value of Dividends in Retirement? ›

Dividends are particularly valuable in retirement because they provide a consistent stream of income that can help cover living expenses.

Are dividends good for retirement? ›

Dividend stocks can be an important source of income in retirement. You get paid an income stream, and if you have your dividend champions in a Roth account, you get a tax advantage on the money to boot.

Can you live off dividends of 1 million dollars? ›

Once you have $1 million in assets, you can look seriously at living entirely off the returns of a portfolio. After all, the S&P 500 alone averages 10% returns per year. Setting aside taxes and down-year investment portfolio management, a $1 million index fund could provide $100,000 annually.

How much money do you need to make $50,000 a year off dividends? ›

This broader mix of stocks offers higher payouts and greater diversification than what you'll get with the Invesco QQQ Trust. And if you've got a large portfolio totaling more than $1.1 million, your dividend income could come in around $50,000 per year.

What is the dividend rule for retirement? ›

The 4% rule says people should withdraw 4% of their retirement funds in the first year after retiring and take that dollar amount, adjusted for inflation, every year after. The rule seeks to establish a steady and safe income stream that will meet a retiree's current and future financial needs.

Are dividends really worth it? ›

Yes, there are a lot of advantages. However, there's also a price to pay for those benefits. The most obvious advantage of dividend investing is that it gives investors extra income to use as they wish. This income can boost returns by being reinvested or withdrawn and used immediately.

Are dividends tax free in retirement? ›

A common exception is dividends paid on stocks held in a retirement account such as a Roth IRA, traditional IRA, or 401(k). These dividends are not taxed since most income or realized capital gains earned by these types of accounts is tax-deferred or tax-free.

How many people have $1,000,000 in retirement savings? ›

However, not a huge percentage of retirees end up having that much money. In fact, statistically, around 10% of retirees have $1 million or more in savings.

How much do I need to invest to make $1 000 a month in dividends? ›

The truth is that most investors won't have the money to generate $1,000 per month in dividends; not at first, anyway. Even if you find a market-beating series of investments that average 3% annual yield, you would still need $400,000 in up-front capital to hit your targets.

Can you retire $1.5 million comfortably? ›

The 4% rule suggests that a $1.5 million portfolio will provide for at least 30 years approximately $60,000 a year before taxes for you to live on in retirement. If you take more than this from your nest egg, it may run short; if you take less or your investments earn more, it may provide somewhat more income.

How to make $5000 a month in dividends? ›

To generate $5,000 per month in dividends, you would need a portfolio value of approximately $1 million invested in stocks with an average dividend yield of 5%. For example, Johnson & Johnson stock currently yields 2.7% annually. $1 million invested would generate about $27,000 per year or $2,250 per month.

How much money do I need to invest to make $3000 a month in dividends? ›

If you were to invest in a company offering a 4% annual dividend yield, you would need to invest about $900,000 to generate a monthly income of $3000. While this might seem like a hefty sum, remember that this investment isn't just generating income—it's also likely to appreciate over time.

How much dividends to make $500 a month? ›

With a 10% yield and monthly payout schedule, you can get to $500 a month with only $60,000 invested. That is, $6,000 per year paid on a monthly basis. Unfortunately, most stocks don't have yields anywhere near 10%. Many do have high enough yields to get you to $500 a month with diligent savings, but don't pay monthly.

What is the 6% retirement rule? ›

As a general guide, you can use the 6% Rule when evaluating the two options. It's a straightforward tool to help assess which choice makes more financial sense over time. Here's how the 6% Rule works: If your monthly pension offer is 6% or more of the lump sum, it might make sense to go with the guaranteed pension.

What is the 45% rule for retirement? ›

Fidelity's 45% rule states that you should plan to save and invest enough to replace at least 45% of your preretirement income. This rule assumes that you retire at age 67 and have no pension income, other than Social Security.

What is the retirement 20x rule? ›

This rule is sometimes described as saving 20 times annual expenses and in other applications 25 times. The 20 times rule is based on first estimating expenses after subtracting any pension and Social Security payments (as estimated by calculators such as www.socialsecurity.gov).

Is there a downside to dividend investing? ›

“One mistake to avoid,” Cabacungan says, “is to buy a company's stock simply because it issues a high dividend.” If the company has leveraged excessive debt to fund the dividend, it could come at the expense of future profitability and hurt growth prospects.

Are dividend stocks good for a 401k? ›

Dividends can provide a hedge against these risks while saving for retirement. Although equity investments are attractive to investors for the potential of higher returns, volatility within the market can be a cause for concern for investors saving for retirement.

Should I take dividends or reinvest in retirement? ›

If you're primarily concerned with paying monthly expenses or reducing high-interest debt, taking dividends in cash may be the right decision. Drawing income directly from investments can provide you with a supplemental source of cash flow if you're retired or other income sources are insufficient to meet expenses.

Are dividends good for long term? ›

Dividend stocks offer long-term investors unique benefits, such as steady, reliable income.

References

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Clemencia Bogisich Ret

Last Updated:

Views: 5599

Rating: 5 / 5 (60 voted)

Reviews: 91% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Clemencia Bogisich Ret

Birthday: 2001-07-17

Address: Suite 794 53887 Geri Spring, West Cristentown, KY 54855

Phone: +5934435460663

Job: Central Hospitality Director

Hobby: Yoga, Electronics, Rafting, Lockpicking, Inline skating, Puzzles, scrapbook

Introduction: My name is Clemencia Bogisich Ret, I am a super, outstanding, graceful, friendly, vast, comfortable, agreeable person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.